Search by
Dispute over a commercial sublease for vocational college premises, focusing on whether Access West Holdings Inc. was entitled to early, rent-free occupation and when its rent obligations began.
The court held that early, rent-free access under clause 4 was strictly conditional on landlord consent, payment of the deposit, and delivery of proper insurance, and did not create a floating two-month rent-free period.
Alleged pre-contractual promises about quick landlord consent and a two-month flexible rent-free period were rejected as unproven and inconsistent with the written sublease and realtor evidence.
Access West’s August 30, 2022 termination was found to be a wrongful repudiation of the sublease, as delays in landlord consent and insurance were not the fault of the plaintiff.
Quantum Parcel Services Ltd. was found bound by a present and enforceable indemnity, making it jointly and severally liable with Access West for all losses under the sublease.
Central College Healthcare Centre Inc. recovered $280,933.23 in damages, plus contractual interest at 24% per annum and solicitor-client costs, and the defendants’ counterclaim for return of the deposit and rent was dismissed.
Facts of the case
The leasing structure and sublease arrangement
Central College Healthcare Centre Inc. was tenant under a commercial head lease for medical-type premises at 181 Keefer Place, Vancouver, and later chose to sublet to Access West Holdings Inc., which planned to operate a vocational college. Their realtors negotiated a sublease under which Access West would occupy from August 1, 2022 to October 30, 2023 at agreed rent, while Central College remained liable to the head landlord.
Early occupancy clause and conditions
The sublease granted a “Fixturing Period and Early Occupancy” from June 1, 2022 until August 1, 2022 during which Access West could use the premises rent-free, but only if four conditions were met: removal of each party’s conditions precedent, landlord’s written consent, payment of a deposit equal to two months’ gross rent, and proof of insurance naming both landlord and sublandlord as additional insureds. A later agreement on May 17, 2022 removed the conditions precedent and added an indemnity by Quantum Parcel Services Ltd. for Access West’s obligations under the sublease.
Performance, delay and purported termination
The deposit was paid on May 20, 2022. Landlord consent was obtained in June 2022 after the required information was provided, and a proper insurance certificate was not delivered until July 18, 2022, when Access West was invited to pick up the keys. Access West later argued it should have had two months of rent-free access regardless of when conditions were satisfied, claimed breach for not being let in on June 1, 2022, and on August 30, 2022 purported to terminate, seeking return of its deposit and August rent. Central College treated this as a repudiation, accepted it, and re-listed the premises for sublease.
Interpretation of the sublease and liability
The court interpreted the sublease as creating two distinct periods: a fixed early occupancy window (June 1 to August 1, 2022) where rent-free access was conditional, and the main term (August 1, 2022 to October 30, 2023) where full rent was unquestionably due. There was no contractual basis for a floating two-month rent-free period starting on actual possession. The court found the delays in satisfying clause 4’s conditions, particularly obtaining proper insurance, were attributable to the defendants, not to Central College, and held that Access West was never denied contractual rights on June 1, 2022. Access West’s termination was therefore a wrongful repudiation. On the indemnity, Quantum’s undertaking was held to be immediately binding, with the requirement for a later document viewed as mere confirmation; Quantum was thus jointly and severally liable with Access West.
Outcome and monetary consequences
Central College was awarded damages of $280,933.23 representing unpaid base and additional rent over the balance of the term, less the deposit and August rent already received. It also obtained contractual interest at 24% per annum on overdue rent and its costs on a solicitor-client basis under the incorporated head lease provisions. The defendants’ counterclaim for return of the deposit and August rent was dismissed, leaving Central College as the successful party without any monetary recovery in favour of the defendants.
Download documents
Plaintiff
Defendant
Court
Supreme Court of British ColumbiaCase Number
S229497Practice Area
Civil litigationAmount
$ 280,933Winner
PlaintiffTrial Start Date