Executive Summary: Key Legal and Evidentiary Issues

• The appellant sought an extension of time to file its factum under articles 84 and 373 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
   
• Counsel for both parties were excused from appearing since the motion was uncontested.
   
• Respondent Ville de Montréal consented to the requested extension.
   
• Granting of the motion allowed the appellant additional time to complete its filing obligations.
   
• No costs were awarded in connection with this procedural motion.

Facts of the case

The appellant, 9052-1170 Québec inc., brought a motion before the Quebec Court of Appeal seeking to extend the deadline for notifying and filing its factum in its appeal against Ville de Montréal. The motion was based on articles 84 and 373 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Because the motion was uncontested, counsel for both parties were excused from appearing at the hearing on June 30, 2026.

Policy and legislative provisions at issue

The motion invoked articles 84 and 373 of the Code of Civil Procedure. No other statutory or contractual provisions are addressed in this decision.

Reasoning and analysis

The deputy clerk noted that the respondent, Ville de Montréal, consented to the appellant's request. Given this consent and the explanations provided in support of the motion, no substantive contestation required resolution, and the matter proceeded without an appearance by either party's counsel.

Ruling and overall outcome

The Court granted the appellant's motion, extending the deadline for notification and filing of its factum to August 24, 2026. The extension was granted with the respondent's consent, and the order was issued without costs.