• CASES

    Search by

Oern v. 2005897 Ontario Ltd.

Executive Summary: Key Legal and Evidentiary Issues

  • Moshe Oren [spelled "Oern" in the case caption and citation], self-represented, sought leave to appeal a decision of Bhangu J.
     
  • Bhangu J.'s underlying decision was dated January 13, 2026, with reasons released April 7, 2026.
     
  • Golan Yaron represented the responding parties, a group of corporate and individual respondents.
     
  • Three judges — Matheson, Koehnen, and Schreck JJ. — heard the motion in writing.
     
  • Dismissal of the leave motion resulted in a costs award against the moving party.
     
  • Costs were fixed at $5,000, all inclusive, payable to the responding parties.

 


 

Facts of the case

Moshe Oren [the case caption and citation spell the name "Oern"], acting as a self-represented moving party, brought a motion before the Divisional Court of the Superior Court of Justice for Ontario seeking leave to appeal a decision of Bhangu J. That underlying decision was dated January 13, 2026, with reasons for decision released April 7, 2026. The responding parties — 2005897 Ontario Ltd., Portfolio Management & Development Inc., Stav Adivi, Zvi Nitzan, David Sourougeon, Yossi Toviyahu, Ronen Bushari, Sharon Shati, and Joseph Petranker — were represented by counsel Golan Yaron. The motion was heard in writing by a panel of three judges: Matheson, Koehnen, and Schreck JJ.

Policy and legislative provisions at issue

The endorsement does not identify or discuss any specific policy terms, contractual clauses, or legislative provisions. It is a brief procedural ruling on a motion for leave to appeal and contains no substantive discussion of underlying legal provisions.

Reasoning and analysis

The endorsement is issued in summary form and does not set out detailed reasoning for the panel's decision. No analysis of the merits of the leave motion is provided in the document beyond the panel's ultimate disposition.

Ruling and overall outcome

The panel dismissed Oren's motion for leave to appeal the decision of Bhangu J. As the unsuccessful party, Oren was ordered to pay costs to the responding parties, the successful party, in the amount of $5,000, all inclusive. The endorsement was released on August 14, 2026.

Moshe Oern
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
2005897 Ontario Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Russell Alexander Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Golan Yaron

Portfolio Management & Development Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Russell Alexander Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Golan Yaron

Stav Adivi
Law Firm / Organization
Russell Alexander Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Golan Yaron

Zvi Nitzan
Law Firm / Organization
Russell Alexander Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Golan Yaron

David Sourougeon
Law Firm / Organization
Russell Alexander Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Golan Yaron

Yossi Toviyahu
Law Firm / Organization
Russell Alexander Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Golan Yaron

Ronen Bushari
Law Firm / Organization
Russell Alexander Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Golan Yaron

Sharon Shati
Law Firm / Organization
Russell Alexander Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Golan Yaron

Joseph Petranker
Law Firm / Organization
Russell Alexander Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Golan Yaron

Ontario Superior Court of Justice - Divisional Court
359/26 ML
Civil litigation
$ 5,000
Respondent