Facts: Mikerlson Vernelus was convicted for possession of a loaded restricted firearm found in his bag in a car, also containing two other individuals.
Issue: Appeal challenged the reasonableness of the conviction, questioning the credibility of Vernelus's denial of knowledge about the firearm in his bag.
Ruling: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial judge's conclusion that the evidence excluded all reasonable alternatives to guilt.
Outcome: Convictions for possession of a loaded restricted firearm and failure to comply with a recognizance condition were affirmed. No amount awarded, as it was a criminal case.
