• CASES

    Search by

Meehan v. Canada
- Shawn Philip Joseph Meehan sought judicial review of a Canada Review Agency (CRA) decision from June 7, 2022, which denied him Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB) for periods 1-4 but granted it for periods 5-7. - During the hearing on February 15, 2023, the CRA conceded the decision was unreasonable and warranted a redetermination, specifically acknowledging Meehan should be eligible for periods 3 and 4. - The officer's initial rejection for periods 1 and 2 was found unjustified as it failed to consider Meehan's business invoices. - Meehan aimed to secure eligibility for all CRB and Canada Emergency Response Benefits until October 2021, beyond the scope of the court's current jurisdiction. - Meehan made additional CRB requests in January 2021, possibly compromised by the same adjudication error. - He stopped further applications due to a belief they would be futile. - Meehan's current eligibility is questionable due to a lapse of more than 60 days since the CRB periods, as per the CRBA legislation. - The court recognized Meehan's potential loss of approximately $1,800 monthly from January to October 2021 due to the initial error. - Expressing sympathy for Meehan's situation, the court encouraged the CRA to mitigate the impact of the mistake. - The review application was partially granted; the decision was sent back for reevaluation by a different CRA officer, with no costs awarded.
SHAWN PHILIP JOSEPH MEEHAN
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Federal Court
T-1347-22
Administrative law
Not specified/Unspecified
Applicant