• CASES

    Search by

Christoforou v. John Grant Haulage Ltd.

Background:

  • Christoforou sought judicial review of a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal decision.
  • The Federal Court dismissed the review with costs awarded to the respondent.
  • A Bill of Costs was filed by the respondent, leading to an assessment process.

Preliminary Issues:

  1. Lack of Supporting Evidence:
    • The respondent's Bill of Costs lacked an affidavit for services claimed.
    • As no disbursements were claimed, the affidavit was deemed unnecessary.
  2. Use of Hours Instead of Units:
    • The Bill of Costs listed hours, not units.
    • The assessment officer converted hours to units per Tariff B, Rule 407.

Assessable Services:

  1. Preparation and Filing (Item 2):
    • 12 hours claimed; only 5 units allowed for usual complexity.
    • Claims for second counsel were disallowed without court direction.
  2. Preparation for Hearing (Item 13):
    • 9 hours claimed; 4 units allowed.
  3. Counsel Fee for Hearing (Item 14):
    • 4 hours claimed; 7 units allowed (including preparation time).

HST:

  • $520.00 in HST was claimed without evidence and was not included in the allowed costs.

Conclusion:

  • The total costs were assessed and allowed at $2,560.00.
  • A Certificate of Costs will be issued.
MICHAEL CHRISTOFOROU
Law Firm / Organization
Chsherbinin Litigation
JOHN GRANT HAULAGE LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Crangle Law Firm
Lawyer(s)

Aaron Crangle

Federal Court
T-752-21
Human rights
$ 2,560
Respondent