This was an appeal case involving Pro-Align Heavy Suspensions Ltd. and Maria de la Torre Trejo. Pro-Align had sued Ms. Trejo for alleged non-performance of 800 hours of work, while Ms. Trejo had counterclaimed for non-payment of salary for two months. The trial judge had ruled in favor of Pro-Align, finding Ms. Trejo to be an hourly paid employee. The judge had allowed Pro-Align's claim partially and had also partially allowed Ms. Trejo's counterclaim. The trial judge had awarded net damages of $5,400 to Pro-Align. On appeal, Ms. Trejo had alleged several errors by the trial judge. The appeals court had partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial judge's finding on Pro-Align's claim and had affirmed the finding on Ms. Trejo's counterclaim. Ms. Trejo had been awarded $3,200, and she had also been granted costs of the appeal.