• CASES

    Search by

Farrugia v Bailey
The defendants sought deductions of $61,719.65 from the costs of future care and $37,422.35 from past income loss. The plaintiff agreed with the deductions for past income loss but disputed the deductions from the costs of future care. The defendants argued for using current ICBC rates for deductions, while the plaintiff requested rates from June 4, 2021, and claimed a global reduction of 40% due to inflation and other benefits. After considering the arguments, the court determined that current ICBC rates should be used for deductions. Additionally, the court found that a global reduction was appropriate, taking into account the value of benefits and the likelihood of full compensation. However, the exact amount of reduction was not specified and will be determined based on these considerations.
Mathew Michael Farrugia
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Lawyer(s)

T. O’Mahony

Andrew Brian Bailey
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Lawyer(s)

D. Graves

Aura-Lee Brigitte Bailey
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Lawyer(s)

D. Graves

Supreme Court of British Columbia
M1810308
Personal injury law
Not specified/Unspecified
Plaintiff