In the case of Cissell et al v Fern et al dated February 8, 2023, the plaintiffs had filed a claim for specific performance to enforce an oral agreement for the transfer of a property. The defendants had counterclaimed seeking occupational rent. The court needed to determine if the matter was suitable for a summary trial, considering various factors such as the amount involved, complexity, urgency, prejudice due to delay, cost, proceedings, credibility, unnecessary complexity, and potential litigation in parts. The plaintiffs had argued for a summary trial, citing a small amount, urgency, simplicity, and credibility issues addressed by documentation. On the other hand, the defendants had opposed it, mentioning incomplete disclosure, lack of examinations, and credibility conflicts. The court had found the matter suitable for a summary trial due to the moderate amount, non-complex issues, financial constraints, and urgency. The court had held that the plaintiff's action was dismissed against the defendants. The occupational rent claim was dismissed as well. Furthermore, the plaintiffs were ordered to vacate the property by February 28, 2023. Both parties were to submit cost submissions within specific timelines, limited to 10 pages.