• CASES

    Search by

Justin Hudson v. Gregory Lick et Al.

- Parties: The applicant was Justin Hudson. The respondents included Gregory Lick.

- Subject Matter: The respondents' decision was allegedly arbitrary, subjective, improper, injudicious, contrary to law, and giving the perception of bias. The respondents allegedly violated ss. 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

- Date: The hearing was set on Feb. 19, 2024.

- Venue: This was a federal case before the Federal Court.

- Amount: No financial award was specified.

Hudson, Justin
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Lick, Gregory
Law Firm / Organization
Attorney General of Canada
Lawyer(s)

Victor Ryan

Ombudsman for the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces
Law Firm / Organization
Government
Federal Court
T-123-23
Constitutional law
Not specified/Unspecified
16 January 2023