In the case of Wilson v. McNeill dated April 24, 2023, the plaintiff, referred to as "Wilson," had provided a loan of $100,000 to the defendant, "Cannabis Innovation Group Ltd." (CIG). CIG had been represented by the defendant Stephen McNeill, who served as its president and sole director. The loan had been secured by a promissory note that had been issued on March 25, 2021. However, CIG had failed to repay the loan on the specified date. Wilson had sought summary judgment against the defendants based on fraudulent misrepresentations made by McNeill. Wilson had relied on representations made by McNeill concerning the financial status of another defendant, "Argentia Gold Corporation" (AGC), during the period when McNeill had been the CEO. McNeill had made false representations about AGC's income projections, inventory value, and corporate worth, which had induced Wilson to extend the loan. The court had determined that McNeill's representations had indeed been false, misleading, and had played a role in inducing Wilson to provide the loan. The court had concluded that there had been fraudulent misrepresentation, entitling Wilson to avoid or rescind the contract with CIG and McNeill. Consequently, the court had granted summary judgment against McNeill personally, thereby issuing an order for him to repay the loan amount of $100,000 along with prejudgment interest. However, the court had dismissed the claim against AGC, asserting that there had been no privity of contract between Wilson and AGC.