The case of Gundarah v Teves, dated September 1, 2023, involved two motor vehicle personal injury claims. The defendants, Mario Jorge Correia Miranda Teves, Ho Ying Chan and Honda Canada Finance Inc.had admitted liability, and the court's judgment had focused on determining appropriate damages. The first accident had occurred on April 22, 2016, involving the plaintiff, Sandeep Kaur Gundarah, her 2008 motor vehicle, and Mr. Teves, who had driven a 1992 Ford Van. The plaintiff's vehicle had sustained $6,417.32 in damages due to a rear-end collision while she had been driving with her son. The second accident, which had taken place on August 16, 2016, had involved the plaintiff's vehicle, driven westbound on Steveston Highway, and a 2015 Honda van driven by Ms. Chan. This collision had rendered the plaintiff's vehicle a total loss, with estimated damages of $10,665. Ms. Chan's van had sustained damages amounting to $21,784.51. The plaintiff had claimed several injuries resulting from these accidents, including central sensitization syndrome, chronic fatigue, depression, and anxiety. She had sought compensation under various categories, including non-pecuniary damages, loss of earning capacity, loss of housekeeping capacity, cost of future care, in-trust claim, and special damages. After careful consideration, the court had awarded the plaintiff a total of $1,260,370.29 in damages across all categories.