Background Facts: The dispute between the appellants and Kam Oi Wong led to an appeal. While the specific details of the initial dispute were not provided in the supplementary judgment, the appellants sought relief on multiple grounds.

Legal Arguments/Issues: The appellants argued that their partial success on appeal was substantial enough to warrant an award of costs. The main legal issue was whether this partial success justified such an award.

Decision and Costs: The Court allowed the appeal in part for four of the six appellants, dismissing the rest. Viewing the appeal holistically, the Court found divided success and ruled that each party should bear their own costs. No specific monetary amounts for costs or awards were mentioned.

Supplementary Reasons: The Court issued supplementary reasons to its earlier judgment (2023 BCCA 180), affirming the decision on costs. The case underscored that divided success on appeal typically results in each party bearing their own costs.