• CASES

    Search by

Lantic Inc. v Public and Private Workers Canada Local 8
I. INTRODUCTION - The plaintiff, Lantic, had sought an interlocutory injunction against alleged tortious activities related to picketing at their premises in Vancouver, BC. II. BACKGROUND A. The Premises - Lantic had operated a cane sugar refinery at 123 Rogers Street, Vancouver, BC. - The defendant union, the Union, Public and Private Workers of Canada Local 8, had represented hourly and salaried employees at the Premises. - Lantic had owned the Premises, which had included various buildings and access points. B. Labour Relations and Picketing - Collective bargaining between Lantic and the Union had failed, leading to a strike that had started on September 28, 2023. - Picketers had obstructed access to the Premises, affecting Lantic's operations. C. Trespass Allegations - Incidents of trespassing on the Premises had occurred, leading to warnings from Lantic. D. Blockading Allegations - Picketers had blocked and obstructed vehicles entering and exiting the Premises, causing delays. E. Intimidation Allegations - The picketers had engaged in intimidating behavior towards Lantic employees and others. F. Form of Order - The court had granted an injunction but with a reduced scope. Financial Awards/Costs: No specific financial awards or costs were mentioned in the provided information.
Lantic Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Public and Private Workers of Canada Local 8
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Lawyer(s)

A. Morrissey

S. Shir

Colin Lamb
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Lawyer(s)

A. Morrissey

S. Shir

Derek McCluskey
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Persons Unknown
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Supreme Court of British Columbia
S237239
Corporate & commercial law
Not specified/Unspecified
Plaintiff