Facts: The case involved a dispute over the validity of an easement claimed by The City of Winnipeg over land owned by Tabet et al.
Issue: The primary legal question was whether the City held a valid easement for a public walkway over the plaintiffs' properties.
Court's Ruling: The court determined that the City of Winnipeg did not have a valid easement over the plaintiffs' land. It found that the City's arguments for statutory, agreement-based, and prescriptive easements were not supported by sufficient evidence.
Costs/Damages Awarded: The specific amount of costs or damages awarded to the successful party, if any, was not detailed in the provided content of the document.
