Facts: The dispute revolves around a residential lease agreement between Grand Bazaar Ala Turk North American Corporation (plaintiff) and Hesham Sulaiman Hammad (defendant) that allegedly contained an option to purchase the property. The plaintiff contended they had the right to purchase the property under the terms of the lease, while the defendant argued that the terms were not clear enough to constitute a genuine purchase option.

Issue: The core issue was whether the lease agreement provided a clear and enforceable option to purchase the property. The defendant challenged the validity of this option on the grounds of vagueness and lack of specific terms required for a contract of real estate sale.

Court's Ruling: The court ruled in favor of the defendant, Hesham Sulaiman Hammad, finding that the lease did not contain a valid option to purchase. The supposed option was deemed merely an agreement to negotiate, lacking the necessary definitive terms to be enforceable as a contract to purchase real estate.

Costs/Damages Awarded: The defendant was deemed entirely successful in the summary trial and was normally entitled to costs, although specific amounts were not detailed in the provided excerpts. The court allowed for submissions on costs if the parties chose to present them.