Key Points:

1. Background:

   • JL owns technology to improve high-pressure gas pipeline efficiency.
   • JL licensed this technology to the defendants.
   • JL claims the defendants misused the technology and infringed patents.

2. Allegations:

   • Unauthorized use of JL’s technology in transporting enriched natural gas.
   • Breach of limited use licenses.
   • Patent infringement (Canadian and US).

3. Defendants' Motion:

   • Summary dismissal based on:
     • Statute of limitations under Alberta law.
     • Lack of jurisdiction over US patents.

4. Court’s Decision:

   • Granted summary dismissal due to expired limitation period.
   • Claims related to US patents are outside Alberta court’s jurisdiction.

5. Limitation Period:

   • Two-year limitation period under Alberta law applies.
   • JL knew of the alleged injury by November 27, 2013, but filed the claim on May 11, 2016.

6. Jurisdiction:

   • US patent claims dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
   • Remaining action limited to Canadian patent infringement.

Conclusion:

• The court dismissed JL’s claims based on statute of limitations and jurisdictional issues, limiting any surviving action to Canadian patent infringement.
• The document does not specify any monetary award, costs, or damages granted or ordered.