Context:

• Schwartz opposed developments near his property.
• He initially appealed to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB), which ruled it lacked jurisdiction under the HRM Charter.

Court Analysis:

• Delay: Significant but excused due to misleading HRM information and legal novelty.
• Intent: Schwartz promptly appealed, showing a bona fide intention for review.
• Excuse for Delay: Misleading HRM information was reasonable.
• Merit: Grounds for review were not frivolous.
• Prejudice: Both parties faced potential prejudice; HRM's misleading information contributed to the delay.

Conclusion: Schwartz’s motion to extend time for filing Notices for Judicial Review was granted until March 28, 2024. Costs of $500 were awarded against Canadian International Capital Inc., with no costs sought by or against HRM.