• CASES

    Search by

Chomlak v Myer

Key Facts

  • Agreement: Option-to-Purchase Agreement signed on September 28, 2015.
  • Property: Agricultural property, SE 7-55-12-W4, priced at $160,000.
  • Dispute: Respondent deems the agreement unenforceable, refuses to sell, and questions the damages claimed by the applicant. Respondent agrees to reimburse taxes paid.

Background

  • Power of Attorney: Respondent's husband, Brian Myer, since October 27, 2020.
  • Incapacity: Respondent declared incapable on January 8, 2021.
  • Property Use: Rented to non-family members since 2000, specifically to Mr. James Antoniuk from 2014 to 2021.
  • Agreement Signing: Witnessed by the Applicant’s mother during an event in 2015.

Issues

  1. Validity of the Contract: Whether the Agreement constitutes a valid option-to-purchase contract.
  2. Enforceability: If valid, whether it is unenforceable due to unconscionability or undue influence.
  3. Damages: Whether the Applicant is entitled to damages or reimbursement.

Analysis

  • Lack of Consideration: Actions taken by the applicant did not constitute valid consideration for the agreement.
  • Contract Formation: Lacked specificity on exclusivity, irrevocability, and sale creation process, making it unenforceable.

Conclusion

  • Agreement Unenforceable: Due to lack of consideration and specificity.
  • Unjust Enrichment: Applicant awarded $4,143.20 for property taxes paid.
  • Costs: If not agreed within 30 days, parties may apply for further direction.

 

Garrett Chomlak
Law Firm / Organization
Hillenbrand Kozicki LLP
Lawyer(s)

Travis McKay

Patricia Myer
Law Firm / Organization
Dixon Legal
Lawyer(s)

Charles A. Dixon

Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2103 00139
Civil litigation
$ 4,143
Respondent