• CASES

    Search by

Fisher v. Nagamuthu

Issue:
Plaintiffs sought summary judgment for a mortgage default on a property at 6 Whistling Hills Drive, Scarborough, aiming to enforce the mortgage debt and obtain possession.

Background:
The mortgage, issued on February 28, 2022, was for $960,000 at a 6.99% interest rate for one year. The Defendants defaulted when the mortgage matured on February 22, 2023. A Notice of Sale was issued, but the Defendants failed to redeem or refinance.

Court's Analysis:

  • Test for Summary Judgment: Following Hryniak v. Mauldin, the court assessed if genuine issues required a trial.
  • Findings: Defendants failed to provide evidence to dispute the mortgage terms or amounts owed.
  • Liquidated Damages: Ruled as not violating the Interest Act, as they are not a "fine, penalty, or rate of interest."

Ruling:
The court granted summary judgment to the Plaintiffs:

  • Defendants must pay the outstanding mortgage amounts, including interest, fees, and liquidated damages.
  • Defendants must vacate the property.
  • Plaintiffs may issue a writ of possession.

Total Monetary Award:

  • Principal: $960,000
  • Interest: $92,476.55
  • NSF Fees: $500
  • Statement Fee: $350
  • Discharge Fee: $350
  • Legal Fees: $1,155.50
  • Liquidated Damages: $16,776
  • Pre-Judgment Interest: Calculated from July 8, 2024
  • Post-Judgment Interest: Ongoing per the mortgage agreement

Costs:
No additional costs beyond the liquidated damages, deemed sufficient to cover motion-related expenses.

Total Amount Granted: $1,071,608.05, plus applicable pre- and post-judgment interest.

FILIPP FISHER
Law Firm / Organization
Uptown Law
Lawyer(s)

Amanda Deveaux

ELIZABETH KRON
Law Firm / Organization
Uptown Law
Lawyer(s)

Amanda Deveaux

THAYALAN NAGAMUTHU
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
THAYAPARI THAYALAN
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-23-696424
Real estate
$ 1,071,608
Plaintiff