Background:

• Sher-E Punjab leased transmission facilities from Corus under a 2019 agreement to operate a Punjabi radio station.
• Payment disputes arose due to alleged delays caused by Corus and an oral agreement purportedly excusing fees until Sher-E became operational in late 2020.
• Corus issued multiple termination notices, including one in 2024 for $38,319 in unpaid fees.

Issues:

1. Should Sher-E receive relief from forfeiture to prevent the lease’s termination?
2. What terms should apply if relief is granted?

Court’s Analysis:

• Sher-E’s Conduct: While some lapses occurred, the court found Sher-E’s actions reasonable given delays, disputes, and family bereavement.
• Gravity of Breach: The breach involved less than $30,000—minor compared to Sher-E’s $2.3 million site investment.
• Disparity of Harm: Termination would cause significant financial loss to Sher-E, including site-specific investments and operational risks, while Corus’s interests could be protected through payment.

Decision:

• The court granted relief from forfeiture, reinstating the agreement, with Sher-E required to pay all outstanding amounts within five business days.
• Future courts are not bound to grant relief for new breaches.
• Costs will be determined if parties cannot agree.
• The exact amount for monetary award was not specified.