Background:

• In June 2023, three employees of Great North Equipment Inc. (the applicants) resigned and were alleged to have breached fiduciary and contractual duties. They reportedly used confidential information to form a competing business with Paloma Pressure Control entities.
• A consent injunction issued on August 1, 2023, imposed obligations on the departed employees, including non-solicitation of employees/customers, prohibiting the use of confidential information, and surrendering electronic devices for inspection.
• Great North sought to extend these obligations to the Paloma entities, but Justice Lema dismissed this application on September 6, 2024, allowing the injunction’s non-solicitation clause to expire.
• The applicant appealed Justice Lema’s decision and sought a stay of his order pending the appeal, set for January 13, 2025.

Legal Issue: Whether the Alberta Court of Appeal should grant a stay of Justice Lema’s order pending appeal.

Decision:

• Justice Joshua Hawkes dismissed the application for a stay. He determined:
  • The stay would effectively grant the remedy sought in the appeal prematurely, which is impermissible.
  • A stay cannot be issued on an order lacking affirmative or executory provisions.
• No judgment was made regarding the appeal's merits or harm balance.

Key Authorities Cited:

• Noscenco v Bagayeva (2015 ABCA 266)
• Denis v Sauvageau (2022 ABCA 166)
• Dr Vu v College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta (2023 ABCA 377)

Outcome: Application for a stay denied; appeal remains scheduled. 

• The document does not specify any monetary awards, damages, or costs granted in this ruling.