• CASES

    Search by

Cook v Risling and Lost River

Background:
Darren Cook sued Robert Risling and Lost River Water Co. Ltd. over alleged inadequate water pressure and safety concerns in Mission Ridge, Saskatchewan. Cook claimed these issues breached contractual and regulatory obligations. Lost River denied specific water pressure requirements and cited compliance with Water Security Agency (WSA) regulations.

Legal Issues:

  1. Breach of Contract: Cook alleged Lost River failed its contractual obligations, but neither party produced the 2008 contract.
  2. Negligence: Cook claimed Lost River breached its duty of care by failing to ensure adequate water pressure and safety.
  3. Regulatory Compliance: Cook argued Lost River violated WSA pressure standards, but the court found no such requirement.

Court’s Decision:
The court ruled that Cook presented no evidence supporting claims of inadequate pressure or unsafe water. It found Lost River complied with applicable WSA regulations and dismissed these claims via summary judgment. Unrelated allegations, such as malicious prosecution and emotional harm, were allowed to proceed.

Outcome and Costs:
The central claims were dismissed, and Cook’s $250,000 damages claim was denied. Costs were awarded to the defendants, Robert Risling and Lost River Water Co. Ltd., as "costs in the cause," with the exact amount deferred.

Darren Cook
Law Firm / Organization
Wardell Gillis
Lawyer(s)

Glenn A. Wright

Robert Risling
Law Firm / Organization
Busse Law Professional Corporation
Lost River Water Co. Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Busse Law Professional Corporation
Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan
QBG-SA-00348-2019
Civil litigation
Not specified/Unspecified
Defendant