• CASES

    Search by

Zhao v Jiao

Case Background
Xu Qing Zhao, Yuan-Cheng Ge (also known as Yuan Cheng Ge), and Yue Ping Ke sued Jin Qin Jiao, Tian Yi Zhang, and Ya Ran Li over disputes concerning the purchase and sale of a residential property in Richmond, British Columbia. The plaintiffs alleged unpaid purchase price and sought remedies including breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and a resulting trust.

Legal Issues
The case centered on whether the plaintiffs could maintain a certificate of pending litigation (CPL) under section 215 of the Land Title Act (LTA). The plaintiffs also sought damages of $1,850,000, claiming unpaid purchase amounts for the Richmond property. The defendants argued for cancellation of the CPL and summary dismissal under Rule 9-6 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, asserting that the pleadings did not support an interest in land.

Court’s Decision
The court ruled that the CPL was improperly registered as the plaintiffs failed to plead a valid interest in land. The alleged claims for unjust enrichment and constructive trust were not adequately supported. Justice Hughes found that no causative link was shown between the pleadings and the property interest.

Costs Award
The court granted Jin Qin Jiao her application to cancel the CPL under section 215 of the LTA and ordered costs in her favor at Scale B, payable in the cause.

This judgment focused on procedural compliance and did not resolve broader claims, leaving some issues adjourned.

Xu Qing Zhao
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Lawyer(s)

S. Chiu

Yuan-Cheng Ge also known as Yuan Cheng Ge
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Lawyer(s)

S. Chiu

Yue Ping Ke
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Lawyer(s)

S. Chiu

Jin Qin Jiao
Law Firm / Organization
Bridgehouse Law LLP (BHL Vancouver)
Lawyer(s)

Ryan LaPlante

Tian Yi Zhang
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Ya Ran Li
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Supreme Court of British Columbia
S244261
Real estate
Not specified/Unspecified
Defendant