• CASES

    Search by

DRLD Buildings Inc. v. Construction Karéco Inc.

Key Facts

  • DRLD hired Karéco to renovate and expand a terrace and build a shed for $39,206.48.
  • Work began in April 2021 but was halted by Daniel-René Doire in June due to concerns about municipal compliance.
  • Karéco attempted to complete the work on June 22, 2021, but Doire demanded modifications. When Karéco refused, he asked them to leave.
  • DRLD then hired another contractor to demolish and rebuild everything for $80,896.45 and sued Karéco for $50,402, claiming defective work.

Legal Issues & Decision

  1. Notice of Defects: DRLD never formally notified Karéco of alleged defects before hiring another contractor, violating contract terms.
  2. Proving Defects: The inspection report was not conclusive, and expert testimony showed work was unfinished, not defective.
  3. Urgency: DRLD waited two months before hiring another contractor, proving there was no urgency.
  4. Damages for Stress: Rejected, as Karéco acted in good faith, and DRLD terminated the contract unfairly.

Final Ruling

  • DRLD’s claim was dismissed in full.
  • Karéco was not liable for new contractor costs.
  • DRLD must pay legal costs. No amount specified.
DRLD BUILDINGS INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Daoust Siroy Inc.
Lawyer(s)

Nicholas D'Aoust

DANIEL-RENE DOIRE
Law Firm / Organization
Daoust Siroy Inc.
Lawyer(s)

Nicholas D'Aoust

LISETTE NAVARRO
Law Firm / Organization
Daoust Siroy Inc.
Lawyer(s)

Nicholas D'Aoust

construction karéco inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Mathieu Kellner Avocat Inc.
Lawyer(s)

Benoit Guindon

Court of Quebec
500-22-273898-224
Construction law
Not specified/Unspecified
Defendant