• CASES

    Search by

Poesl v. Sharon Veterinary Clinic Professional Corporation

Background

  • Plaintiff: Maya Poesl, a veterinarian employed for 20 years at Sharon Veterinary Clinic.
  • Defendant: Sharon Veterinary Clinic Professional Corporation, owned and managed by Diane Clark.
  • Claim: Wrongful dismissal or constructive dismissal.

Key Facts

  • Plaintiff was laid off during COVID-19 but later reinstated.
  • Dispute arose when Ms. Clark, the clinic owner, refused to send a termination letter to a client (West) who had previously made threats.
  • Plaintiff, citing workplace safety, refused to return unless the letter was sent.
  • Clark refused, and Poesl considered herself terminated.

Plaintiff's Position

  • Asserted she was wrongfully or constructively dismissed.
  • Sought 24 months’ notice based on her prior earnings.
  • Claimed moral damages ($10,000–$30,000) and Human Rights Code damages ($20,000–$30,000).
  • Argued that returning to work was unreasonable due to a "poisoned workplace."

Defendant's Position

  • Asserted that Ms. Clark took appropriate steps to ensure staff safety.
  • Argued that refusing to send the termination letter was reasonable.
  • Contended that Poesl’s refusal to return amounted to voluntary resignation.
  • Suggested 12 months’ notice if dismissal was found.

Court’s Decision

  • Plaintiff was not wrongfully or constructively dismissed; her insistence on the termination letter was unreasonable.
  • Refusal to return to work was deemed a resignation.
  • Moral damages and Human Rights Code claims dismissed due to lack of medical evidence.
  • No damages awarded; case dismissed.
MAYA POESL
Law Firm / Organization
Zeilikman Law
Lawyer(s)

Dennis Ovsyannikov

SHARON VETERINARY CLINIC PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Lawyer(s)

John Yach

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-20-00003603-0000
Labour & Employment Law
Not specified/Unspecified
Defendant