• CASES

    Search by

Royal Bank of Canada v. Greb Tele-Data Inc.

Key Issues

  • Robert B. Woodrow sought a ruling that a debt from a 2016 default judgment survived Ross E. Greb’s bankruptcy under s. 178(1)(d) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA).
  • To succeed, Woodrow needed to prove:
    1. The debt arose from fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation, or defalcation.
    2. The debt arose in the course of a fiduciary relationship.

Findings

  • There was no dispute that Ross E. Greb fraudulently embezzled funds from Greb Tele-Data Inc., where both he and Woodrow were directors and shareholders.
  • However, the motion judge ruled that Greb did not owe Woodrow a fiduciary duty.
  • Woodrow argued that a power imbalance existed because Greb was the majority shareholder and held a position of trust.
  • The Court of Appeal upheld the motion judge’s decision, finding that she correctly applied the law and was entitled to conclude there was no fiduciary duty.
  • The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.
Royal Bank of Canada
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Greb Tele-Data Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Anne Woodrow
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Robert B. Woodrow
Law Firm / Organization
Duncan, Linton LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel W. Veinot

Ross E. Greb
Law Firm / Organization
Spetter Zeitz Klaiman PC
Lawyer(s)

Matthew Harris

Greb Tele-Data Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Greb Tele-Data Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
James Ross Greb
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-24-CV-0785
Corporate & commercial law
Not specified/Unspecified
Respondent