• CASES

    Search by

Marper Holdings Limited v. Foxpark Development Corporation

Case Overview

  • Marper Holdings Limited (“Marper”) sought $2,361,348.51 from Foxpark Development Corporation (“Foxpark”), Carl Strand, and John Strand for a defaulted $2M mortgage loan secured by a first charge on 77 Fox Street, Penetanguishene.
  • Marper also requested 12% post-judgment interest, possession of the property, and a writ of possession.
  • The defendants’ counterclaim sought $34M in damages, alleging the action was malicious and vindictive, but it lacked a recognizable legal basis.

Findings

  • Loan & Default: Foxpark’s November 1, 2023, payment was dishonored, no further payments were made, and the mortgage matured unpaid on December 13, 2023.
  • Guarantors: Carl and John Strand personally guaranteed the loan. John received independent legal advice.
  • No Defence Evidence: The defendants missed court deadlines and failed to file sworn evidence.

Court Ruling

  1. Summary Judgment Granted – No genuine issue required a trial.
  2. Judgment Against Foxpark & the Strands – Ordered to pay $2,361,348.51 + 12% annual post-judgment interest.
  3. Possession Granted – Marper received immediate possession and leave to issue a writ of possession.
  4. Counterclaim Dismissed – No valid cause of action.
  5. Costs Ordered – Defendants must pay $25,509.15 on a substantial indemnity basis.
MARPER HOLDINGS LIMITED
Law Firm / Organization
Spetter Zeitz Klaiman PC
FOXPARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
CARL STRAND
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
JOHN STRAND
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
MR. AND MRS. GILBERT KUIPER
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
MARTIN PRICE
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
MORTGAGE INTELLIGENCE, LAW FIRM
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
SPETTER-ZEITZ-KLAIMAN PC BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS
Law Firm / Organization
Not specified
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-24-00000527-0000
Real estate
$ 25,509
Plaintiff